|
Memory for committing a crime: Effects of arousal, proximity, and gender
HEATHER L. PRICE, ZINA LEE, and J. DON READ
Simon Fraser University
Few researchers have investigated the memories of active participants
in an emotionally arousing crime. The present study used a mock crime
paradigm to explore participant memories for a low, moderate, or highly
arousing event. Forty-seven undergraduate participants committed a "theft"
of an exam from a professor's office. Two weeks after the theft, participants
completed a cognitive interview, recalled objects from the professor's
office, and constructed a map of the route to and from the crime room.
Arousal improved reports on a map recall task but no other recall indices.
Although there was a general superiority of recall of proximal over distal
details, arousal only infrequently interacted with proximity. Some support
was found for proximity (spatialßtemporal distinction) as a useful proxy
for centrality. Future work will benefit from an examination of the overlap
between definitions of centrality and proximity with more traditional
stimuli. |
|