List journal issues    
 
 
Home List journal issues Table of contents Subscribe to AJP

Abstract

Volume 121 • Number 1

Spring 2008



 


Recalling taboo and nontaboo words

TIMOTHY JAY
Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts

CATHERINE CALDWELL-HARRIS
Boston University

KRISTA KING
New York University


People remember emotional and taboo words better than neutral words. It is well known that words that are processed at a deep (i.e., semantic) level are recalled better than words processed at a shallow (i.e., purely visual) level. To determine how depth of processing influences recall of emotional and taboo words, a levels of processing paradigm was used. Whether this effect holds for emotional and taboo words has not been previously investigated. Two experiments demonstrated that taboo and emotional words benefit less from deep processing than do neutral words. This is consistent with the proposal that memories for taboo and emotional words are a function of the arousal level they evoke, even under shallow encoding conditions. Recall was higher for taboo words, even when taboo words were cued to be recalled after neutral and emotional words. The superiority of taboo word recall is consistent with cognitive neuroscience and brain imaging research.

view PDF
 

 

 

 
Home | Issue Index
 
© 2007 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
Content in American Journal of Psychology is intended for personal, noncommercial use only. You may not reproduce, publish, distribute, transmit, participate in the transfer or sale of, modify, create derivative works from, display, or in any way exploit the American Journal of Psychology database in whole or in part without the written permission of the copyright holder.


ISSN: 1939-8298


Terms and Conditions of Use